PL. 012026system · product
A platform that rebuilds a website as a design file
Reconstructing any page into native Figma structure — auto-layout and real grids — with fidelity measured as a build gate, not a claim.
Three intake routes — paste, hosted URL, or ZIPSource markup, reconstructed in placeClean — tidies names and structureFaithful — exactly as shippedDetects repeats and promotes them to componentsTelemetry is off unless asked forEmits native auto-layout and Grid- Three intake routes — paste, hosted URL, or ZIP
- Source markup, reconstructed in place
- Clean — tidies names and structure
- Faithful — exactly as shipped
- Detects repeats and promotes them to components
- Telemetry is off unless asked for
- Emits native auto-layout and Grid
Constraint
A designer handed a live website has two bad options: trace it by hand, or paste a screenshot. Both discard the structure that makes a file editable — the layout rules, the spacing intent, the repeats. Any tool that rebuilds the page has to reconstruct that intent, and it has to be able to prove how close it got, on every commit, or the claim is worthless.
Decision
We reconstruct into native Figma primitives rather than flat frames, and we treat fidelity as arithmetic. A 66-page corpus is rasterised and scored on every run — layout, typography, spacing, and structural similarity against the source — and the score is a CI gate. CSS Grid reconstructs into native Figma Grid rather than being flattened to stacks (ADR-041).
Consequence
Across the 66-page corpus the reconstruction scores 1.00 layout, 1.00 typography and 0.996 spacing, with a mean SSIM of 0.935 against the source render. Native Grid lifted arranged containers from 81.4% to 83.3% — 130 of 156. The gate now fails the build before a regression can ship.